longevitywatch
Evidence answer · Nutrition & prevention

Are ultra-processed products bad for your longevity?

Yes · Moderate evidence

Eating a lot of ultra-processed products is associated with a shorter lifespan and more chronic disease, but the effect varies considerably by product type and largely disappears when your overall diet quality is good. Eating less processed meat and improving your overall eating pattern offers the greatest benefit.

Read the full answer

Meat and fish products in processed form, such as sausages, deli meats and ready-made burgers, show the strongest association with premature death. People who eat a lot of these products have a 6 to 43 percent higher risk of dying, depending on the cause of death. Soft drinks (with or without sugar), dairy desserts and ultra-processed breakfast foods are linked to a slightly elevated mortality risk of 7 to 9 percent.

For premature death overall, the risk estimates found vary widely: from just 4 percent higher in a large study with more than 114,000 participants, to 21 percent higher in a summary of multiple studies. Per 50 grams more per day, that works out to roughly 2 percent additional risk. That sounds modest, but ultra-processed products are rarely eaten in small quantities. The association with cardiovascular mortality appears larger (50 percent higher risk), but the individual studies are of very low quality.

The best-supported association is with type 2 diabetes. For every step up in the amount of ultra-processed food consumed, the risk rises by around 12 percent. This is also the only area in which the evidence is rated as 'moderate', rather than 'low' or 'very low'. For colorectal cancer, a smaller but comparably reliable association of 4 percent per 10 percent more ultra-processed food in the diet has been found.

There are two crucial nuances. First: in a large American study with nearly 35 years of follow-up, no association with death from cancer or cardiovascular disease could be found when those causes of death were examined separately. Second: in people with good overall diet quality, the mortality risk largely disappeared. This suggests that the overall pattern of eating matters at least as much as how much you eat from a bag or a box.

The core scientific debate has not yet been settled: is the processing itself the problem, or are ultra-processed products simply a good marker for an unhealthy eating pattern in general? All available associations have been found in observational research, in which cause and effect cannot be proven conclusively. Notably, of 45 health outcomes studied, 71 percent showed an association with ultra-processed food, but for most of those associations the quality of the evidence is low to very low.

The evidence
5 studies · 2 meta-analyses · ≈ 114,000 participants

Based on multiple meta-analyses and large cohort studies (PMID 38418082, 38719536, 38363072, 35658669, 32630022). All associations are associative; causality has not been demonstrated. GRADE quality for most outcomes is low to very low, with the exception of type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer (moderate).

Last reviewed: July 2026
Related answers
How bad is ultra-processed food, and what does it do to you?
Is red and processed meat really bad for me?
Are beans and legumes good for longevity?
Is red and processed meat really bad for me?
Yes · Moderate evidence
Are diet sodas and sweeteners bad for you, and if so, why?
Related research
07 Jun
Ultra-Processed Food Is More Complicated Than It Looks
11 Jun
Ultra-processed food quietly harms your attention
04 Jun
Leading scientists demand action on ultra-processed food
Don't see your question?
Ask it and we'll look it up for you.
Ask a question
Newsletter

Stay in the loop

Twice a week, the most important longevity research in your inbox.