longevitywatch

What do you do with the result of a biological age test?

Preliminary evidence

A biological age higher than your calendar age is a signal, not a diagnosis. Use the result as a reason to scrutinise your lifestyle and discuss it with your doctor, because clear clinical guidelines on what to do with it do not yet exist.

Epigenetic clocks measure patterns in your DNA to estimate a biological age that correlates with disease risk and mortality. There are several types of clocks, they differ from one another, and none has been established as the gold standard. That makes the result difficult to interpret: you cannot say that one clock is 'right' and another is not.

An AI model that used only routine health reports outperformed telomere length and eight epigenetic clocks in predicting mortality. Every year that your biological age was ahead of your calendar age was associated with approximately 5.5% higher mortality risk. This is promising, but it remains an association, not a proven cause. Working out what to actually do with it in the consulting room is the next step, and that step has not yet been taken.

Epigenetic scores can add information on top of known risk factors. They are associated with future diagnoses such as diabetes, stroke, depression and cancer, and that association held up when researchers corrected for lifestyle. But 'associated with' is not the same as 'predicts with certainty', and clinical application has not yet been demonstrated.

What can you practically do with such a result right now? Lifestyle factors such as nutrition, sleep and a regular day-night rhythm appear to influence epigenetic ageing, although cause and effect have not been firmly established there. That is at the same time the most useful handle available: a result that comes out higher than your calendar age is not a diagnosis, but it is a reason to look critically at your sleep, diet and exercise. Tailoring treatments on the basis of biological age measurements is something scientists expect for the future, but it is still awaiting the results of clinical trials and regulatory approval.

The evidence
5 studies · ≈ 10,000,000 participants

This answer rests on several reviews and one study not yet further indexed. The reviews themselves emphasise that there are too few randomised studies for definitive conclusions. The AI study was validated in more than 10 million participants across six cohorts, which lends weight to its findings, but these are associations, not demonstrated causes. Clinical application of biological age measurements has not yet been proven and is awaiting regulatory approval.

Last checked: October 2026 · how this was judged
Related answers

How can I measure my biological age?

Are biological age tests actually accurate?

How reliable are the biological age tests you can buy online?

Can you tell someone's biological age from their face?

What does alcohol do to your biological age?

Related research
16 Oct
Splicing factor SRSF1 slows aging in worms and mice
09 Oct
Speech reveals how fast the brain ages
02 Oct
The body clock controls fat metabolism in fat cells
Don't see your question?
Ask it and we'll look it up for you.
Ask a question →
Newsletter

Stay in the loop

Every Thursday, the most important longevity research in your inbox, focused on what you follow.