What is the TOTOX value and why does it matter for fish oil supplements?
Many fish oil supplements exceed the quality standard for rancidity and also contain fewer active fatty acids than promised. When buying fish oil, look for products with demonstrable quality control for oxidation, because price and expiry date say little about that.
The TOTOX value is a number that indicates how rancid a fish oil supplement has become. It is calculated as two times the so-called peroxide value plus the anisidine value. The first measure reflects recent oxidation, the second reflects breakdown products that have been accumulating for longer. Together they give a more complete picture than either number alone. The international GOED standard (a quality benchmark for fish oil) sets the upper limit at 26.
In practice, that standard is regularly exceeded. In a measurement of 72 American omega-3 supplements, 68% of the flavoured products had a TOTOX value that was too high. For unflavoured products, that figure was 13%. In New Zealand, only 8% of 32 tested products simultaneously met all three oxidation standards. In South Africa, more than 80% of the supplements measured in both 2009 and 2012 had a peroxide value that was too high. Price, expiry date and country of origin turned out to be unreliable signals of quality.
In addition to excessive oxidation values, most products also contain fewer active fatty acids (EPA and DHA) than the label promises. In New Zealand, 69% of products contained less than two thirds of the stated amount. In South Africa, the same was true for more than half of the products. So sometimes you get less of what you want and more of what you do not want.
Whether rancid fish oil is actually harmful to humans is difficult to establish conclusively. Animal studies show damage from oxidised fats, but clinical studies in humans have rarely reported the oxidation status of the oils tested to date. The potential health risks are therefore plausible but not yet clinically proven. What oxidation products such as aldehydes do cause is the familiar fishy smell and taste, one of the reasons people avoid supplements.
Claims based on market surveys conducted in the United States, New Zealand, South Africa and the UAE, plus a review on oxidation and health effects. No randomised trials; evidence for health harm in humans is limited to animal studies and associative studies.
Do antioxidant supplements make sense?
For healthy people, antioxidant supplements such as beta-carotene and vitamin E are not useful as protection against cancer or heart disease, and beta-carotene is frankly inadvisable for (ex-)smokers. The only well-supported exception is the AREDS formula for advanced macular degeneration: discuss this with your ophthalmologist.
How much taurine do you need per day?
There is no official daily recommendation for taurine alone; the WHO standard of 13 mg/kg/day applies to all sulphur-containing amino acids combined. If you eat a varied diet, you will probably manage without supplements, but if you are vegan or receive artificial nutrition, it is worth discussing your taurine status with your doctor.
Is the taurine in energy drinks harmful?
Taurine in common energy drinks does not appear to be harmful, but keep an eye on the caffeine: that is the substance from which the documented risks of energy drinks originate.
Is taking extra vitamin C worthwhile?
Extra vitamin C offers little benefit for most people. Intensive athletes and people following a carnivore diet do have a good reason to supplement, and those who take it daily tend to experience slightly milder symptoms when they catch a cold.
Does omega-3 from fish oil help against chronic inflammation?
Omega-3 from fish oil lowers inflammatory markers in the blood and demonstrably helps in rheumatoid arthritis, but the effect differs by condition and by individual. For joint inflammation, consulting your doctor is the logical step before starting supplementation.
Do fish oil pills keep my memory sharp?
Fish oil may make a modest contribution to attention and memory, but the evidence is not yet strong enough to recommend a pill over a varied, fish-rich dietary pattern.