longevitywatch

Which type of collagen is best to take?

Moderate evidence

For knee complaints, UC-II (type II, unprocessed, 40 mg/day) has the best-documented outcomes in RCTs, but the only independent study found no effect; for skin, low-molecular-weight peptides have the best-supported evidence, and for bone density, specific hydrolysed peptides (5 g/day) are the most studied option.

Which type is best for you depends on your goal. For joints, two types have been studied: native type II collagen (also known as UC-II) and hydrolysed collagen peptides. They work in different ways. UC-II is unprocessed and appears to suppress inflammation in the joint via the immune system. Hydrolysed collagen is broken down into small peptides that can reach joint tissue and thereby protect cartilage.

For knee complaints caused by osteoarthritis, UC-II (40 mg per day) performed well in an RCT with 191 participants: after six months, pain, stiffness and function improved significantly more than with placebo and better than glucosamine with chondroitin. That is a concrete positive signal. At the same time, an independently funded study in 68 participants found that a combination of UC-II and hydrolysed peptides did not work better than a placebo after 12 weeks. The evidence is therefore not clear-cut, and the study that rated UC-II positively was conducted in a setting that was not entirely free from industry interests.

For bones, specific research has been carried out into hydrolysed collagen peptides (5 grams per day). In an RCT with 131 postmenopausal women, bone density of the spine and hip increased measurably after 12 months compared to placebo. This is an interesting result, but it comes from a single study in a specific group.

For skin, low-molecular-weight collagen peptides (1,000 mg per day) appear to improve hydration, wrinkles and elasticity after 12 weeks, as shown in an RCT with 64 participants. Gelatine with vitamin C before exercise can also stimulate the production of new collagen, but this has only been demonstrated in a very small study with eight men. Vitamin C is in any case necessary for collagen production in your own body.

A caveat that applies to this entire field of research: multiple studies have been (co-)funded by manufacturers of collagen ingredients, including a review article written entirely by employees of a collagen producer. This increases the risk that positive results are presented as somewhat larger than they actually are. The only fully independent RCT we have here found no effect at all. That makes caution appropriate.

The evidence
8 studies · ≈ 494 participants

Based on multiple RCTs (n=32 to n=191), one small crossover study (n=8), and two review articles. Important caveat: a considerable portion of the positive evidence comes from (partly) industry-funded research; the only fully independent RCT (PMID 40897777) found no effect.

Last checked: August 2026 · how this was judged
Related answers
Which form of magnesium is best to take?
Moderate evidence
Which form of vitamin B12 is best to take?
Preliminary evidence
Which form of zinc is best to take?
Preliminary evidence
What should you preferably not combine with creatine?
Moderate evidence
Does collagen help your joints and your skin?
Yes · Moderate evidence
Is collagen powder worth it for your joints?
Yes · Moderate evidence
All Collagen answers on “What works”
Related research
01 Sep
GLP-1 drugs are reshaping employer health costs
01 Sep
Heart drug fails: what the trial result tells us
31 Aug
Diabetes drug protects the heart via unexpected pathway
Don't see your question?
Ask it and we'll look it up for you.
Ask a question
Newsletter

Stay in the loop

Twice a week, the most important longevity research in your inbox.