longevitywatch
Evidence answer · Skin

Do polynucleotide or salmon DNA facial treatments actually work?

Preliminary evidence

There are cautious indications that polynucleotide injections may improve the skin around the eyes, but well-controlled evidence is still lacking. If you are considering the treatment, ask your practitioner specifically about the supporting evidence and remain critical of commercial interests.

What does workWhat actually works against skin aging?

Polynucleotides (also known as salmon DNA injections, or sold under brand names such as REJURAN) are injected into the skin and are said to stimulate skin repair, reduce wrinkles, and improve skin texture. That sounds promising, but the research is currently limited and has considerable methodological shortcomings.

For the under-eye area and crow's feet, there are small observational studies and a prospective study in 42 patients that showed improvement up to six months after treatment. Patients were generally satisfied, and side effects were minimal. However, none of these studies included a placebo group, so it is unclear how much of the effect is attributable to the treatment itself and how much to the placebo effect or the passage of time.

The most randomised study, on crow's feet in 218 participants, was later found to have been retracted. That means its results must be considered void. For facial redness and enlarged pores, there are no clinical trials; the only available data come from surveys of cosmetic physicians. Between 77% and 90% of them rated the treatment as effective, but physician opinions are not clinical evidence. In addition, several authors of those studies had a binding relationship with the manufacturer of the product, which undermines the independence of those findings.

For scars and burns, there are isolated case reports without a control group. And although a review article suggests that polynucleotides as an adjunct to another treatment (radiofrequency microneedling) may offer additional benefit, the contribution of polynucleotides specifically cannot be isolated.

In short: for the under-eye area and fine lines, there are cautious indications that the treatment has some effect, but without well-controlled research it remains uncertain how large that effect is. For the other applications, the evidence is even thinner.

The evidence
7 studies · 1 meta-analyses · ≈ 818 participants

All claims are based on observational studies, case reports, a scoping review, and physician opinion surveys. The only randomised study (PMID 39313949) has been retracted. Multiple studies have potential conflicts of interest with manufacturers. No study includes a placebo group.

Last updated: July 2026
Related answers
Do exosomes in skincare really work?
Preliminary evidence
Does a vampire facial (PRP) work against skin ageing?
Moderate evidence
Do peptides in skincare actually do anything?
Yes · Moderate evidence
What actually works against skin aging?
Moderate evidence
Does red light therapy really help against skin ageing?
Preliminary evidence
Does skin cycling really work better for your skin?
Insufficient evidence
Related research
04 Jul
Age spots are packed with senescent skin cells
03 Jul
Age spots are full of senescent skin cells
27 Jun
DNA tags reveal how aging differs across body tissues
Don't see your question?
Ask it and we'll look it up for you.
Ask a question
Newsletter

Stay in the loop

Twice a week, the most important longevity research in your inbox.